Contact Us |  Site Map |  Help Desk  


Search:
 Home   News   Help Desk   Membership   Library   About   
Login to Members Only Area

____________________
Library
  Stable Times
  Papers
  Fee Disclosure Template
  Key Principles

Home > Library > Stable Times > Volume 3, Issue 4  

Newsletter - Stable Times
The quarterly publication of the Stable Value Investment Association
Fourth Quarter 1999 • Volume 3 Issue 4

SVIA Investment & Policy Survey Highlights


By Judy Markland, Landmark Strategies

The Association's third annual survey of stable value investments and investment policies covers more than 97,000 plans with assets of $214.5 billion as of year-end 1998. Responding firms reported stable value asset growth of 10.1% for the year. At 6.35% compared to the previous year's 6.63%, yields credited on the portfolios continue to show good stability and rates well above those available on other DC asset classes offering principal safety and liquidity.

As in previous years, data for the survey was compiled for funds of four different manager types: individual funds managed externally, individual funds managed in-house (typically jumbo funds), commingled funds in bank and investment company pools, and commingled funds in life company full-service plans (invested in general or separate accounts of the life company). This format not only expedites data collection but allows comparisons of investment management styles across various segments of the industry.

Comparison by Type of Stable Value Fund, 12/31/98
Individually Managed Commingled
  Total External
Mgmt.
In-house
Mgmt.
Bank and
Invest Co.
Pools
Life Co.
Full
Service
SV assets (billion) $214.5 $106.3 $19.0 $40.7a $48.5
Average fund size (million) $1.8 $254.9 $1,055.7 $3.6 $0.5
SV assets as % of plan assets 19.5% 14.8% 27.8% N/A 26.5%
Blended rate (net, %) 6.35% 6.41% 6.74% 6.22% 6.21%
Modified duration (yrs.) 2.8 2.3 3.2 2.4 3.7
Credit qualityb 3.2 2.7 3.4 3.0 4.5c
a DC assets only.
b where 1=govts. and agencies, 2=AAA, 3=AA+, etc.
c issuer quality

The following are some of the 1999 survey's key findings for the asset class:

  • Overall credit quality for stable value funds is AA+.
  • Average fund sizes in the survey ranged from $1.1 billion for the jumbo funds managed in-house to $0.5 million for life company full service Stable value funds. Stable value is well represented in all size segments of the DC market.
  • Stable value funds were 19.5% of plan assets at year-end 1998, compared to 21.0% the previous year. Stable value funds were 14.8%, 27.8% and 26.5% respectively for externally managed, internally managed and life company full service segments.
  • General account GICs constituted 48 %% of the fund portfolios, with synthetics at 41 % and separate account GICs 3 % (see graph).
  • Externally managed individual funds have 12.1 stable value issuers on average, while in-house funds have 13.4 and pools 20.4.
  • Non-participating contracts comprised 35.2% of stable value fund portfolios at year-end 1998; fully 49.4% of the investments in stable value portfolios participate in gains and losses from changes in asset values and net participant withdrawals. These gains and losses are smoothed over time to ensure the fund's principal stability.
  • New investment volume for stable value portfolios totaled $46 billion during 1998. With a lower level of market interest rates during the year, yields on stable value placements fell to 6.13% from 6.55% in 1997.

 

Read Next: Tracking Stable Value Yield Spreads

 


Investment Glossary
Define your term using our glossary:

 

© Copyright 2002-2006 Stable Value Investment Association. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement